Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A Wellington Lawyer in Trouble

Some verj extraordinary proceerliugs took pluce privately on Saturday aficrnooa in (lie Resident Maajistrute's Court in Ireference to a criminal charge preferred against a member of the legnl profession in this city. Thfc authorities absolutely decline to «ive any. information on i he subject, but so far as we can ascertain, the facts are as follows : — The information is laid under the 74th clause of the Larceny AcL for the misappropriation of a sum or £83, entrusted to the person named with specific instructions «s to the purpose for which it was to be used, and the case is tlierofore precisely similar to Waring; Taylor's. No regular cummons or warrant, it is believed, was issued on the information, nor were the police called on to arrest, but in some way theoerion charged camebri ore M r War.lell on Saturday, long after office hours, was -formally charged with the* offence, and -fiten remanded until the sth of January, 1) i I beifcg ■ accepted and forthcoming. Tl.e imiljs said to fee that of accused in £M) :nul that of his clerk in £50, but it is difficult to obtain reliable details, as the Court officers declare they are entirely isnnrnnt of the proceedings. Tho secrecy obserred has caused a good deal of com* ment in the city to-day, and it is certainly not of a character favorable; to the extraordinary course pursued. Of course a magistrate has power to take the prelfiniriary examination in an indictable case : prirately, when it may " appear to hittr that the ends of justice,, will be oest answered by so doing." It is difficult to <eehow this ground cao 7 * be- alleged in justification 41 the action' taken m regard ta the preaent case- The remand to the £th January is, however, quite irregular, «8 no magistrate can remand' a person charged with an indictable offence, for more than eight days at a time,, and It ls^ very (questionable, therefore, whether the" bail will be any good after eight day's dapftf.T-^PMt.;

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18851219.2.25

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume VII, Issue 82, 19 December 1885, Page 3

Word Count
339

A Wellington Lawyer in Trouble Feilding Star, Volume VII, Issue 82, 19 December 1885, Page 3

A Wellington Lawyer in Trouble Feilding Star, Volume VII, Issue 82, 19 December 1885, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert