Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MONKTON v. MON KTON

Wellington. December 2. This was a petition for dissolution of marriage on the part of the wife, Emma Monckton, Petitioner deposed ; I am tho wife ot Charles Henry Monckton, photographer, and was I roamed to him in Auckland on the i ?.?rd. November, ISBI, wben I was twelve years and two month-* old. Mrs I yr.ch lived with us after tbe manA.ge I Had been previously Jiving- with Mrs Lynch, and Monck- [ ton bad lieen cohabiting* with her I j was forced into marriage by threats [ and persuasion. Monckton said he would turn nic and Vlrs Lynch (two sisters) out into the streets ii I did not marry him. Mrs Lynch also persuaded me to marry him. My sister passed tor mv mother at the marriage, and my age was stated to be fifteen year's. My mother was dead at tbe time, and my father was imbecile, I did not occupy the same room as my husband that, night — Mrs Lynch did. [Witness described in detail her movements for seme months after marriage, resulting in her escaping from her husband.] I declined to go back to my husband, becnu.se I bated bim. He was recently sentenced to a term of imprisonment for making a false declaration under the Marriage Act. — Alice Baxter, alias Lynch alias Howell, was next called. Sbe refused to answer whether she was sister of petitioner or not. His Honor warned her that she might be punished for contempt of court if sbe declined to answer reasonable questions. Witness said she could not swear to what she did not know. Sbe went on to say that to the best of her belief petitioner was ber sister. Mr D. G. Cooper was tbe only other witness examined, and he. gave evidence as to Lynch and Monckton having been sentenced for making a false declaration. This was petition's case, and tho matter was then adjourned for argument before bis Honor as to the question of legal cruelty.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/FS18841204.2.8.1

Bibliographic details

Feilding Star, Volume VI, Issue 75, 4 December 1884, Page 2

Word Count
332

MONKTON v. MONKTON Feilding Star, Volume VI, Issue 75, 4 December 1884, Page 2

MONKTON v. MONKTON Feilding Star, Volume VI, Issue 75, 4 December 1884, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert