CODICILS CHALLENGED
COURT OF APPEAL CASE [Per United Press Association.] WELLINGTON, October 2. In the Court of Appeal to-day in the case of Clemow and others v. the Guardian Trust and others, counsel for the appellants made the following submissions based on the evidence and the ; aw: —(1) That there was" general unsonndness of mind which rendered invalid both of the codicils which were attacked in the present proceedings; (2) if that were not established, then there was partial or delusional insanity which had the same effect. The submissions were considered in great detail with respect to both codicils. It was contended that the deceased was suffering from delusions of a general nature on a variety of subjects. After completion of the ease for the appellant, the court adjourned till Monday. [The case has reference to bequests totalling nearly £1,000.]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19361003.2.140
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 22460, 3 October 1936, Page 21
Word count
Tapeke kupu
140CODICILS CHALLENGED Evening Star, Issue 22460, 3 October 1936, Page 21
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in