Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SOUTH ISLAND PARLIAMENT

AN INVERCARGILL SUGGESTION PRESENT SYSTEM FAVOURS NORTH [Per United Press Association.] INVERCARGILL, September 27. The establishment of a Parliament for the South Island was suggested _in a letter, from Mr W. Hinchey, chairman of the Southland Electric Power Board, which was read at a meeting of the Southland Provincial Executive of the Farmers’ Union to-day. It was decided to place the matter on the agenda paper for the next meeting. “ There is no disguising the fact that we have for some years been losing ground to' the north,” Mr Hinchey wrote,. “We have lost our regular and natural shipping connection with Australia, and trade has been drawn to the northern ports. The Union Steam Ship Company removed its headquarters from Dunedin, the place of its birth, to Wellington. This was a very serious loss to Otago and Southland. We are threatened with the centralising of shipping in Wellington, and should this occur it wnlud spell destruction to the ports of Bluffi and Otago, and largely affect the port of Lyttelton. The tourist traffic to Rotorua has contributed extensively to the growth and prosperity of ’Auckland, and notwithstanding that this island has much to attract tourists, we have not had a failshare of the revenue derived from that source.” Two Parliaments, Mr Hinchey continued, w-ould give members more time for details, and would largely avoid the necessity for commissions. The _ tendency seemed to be in the of smaller Parliamentary territories. Points to be considered were::— (1) Would a Parliament situated at Christchurch or Dunedin help towards greater prosperity in this island? (2) Would it be more costly than one Parliament? (3) Are we getting an equitable share of public money—viz., Highway Fund. Unemployment Fund, and expenditure through the Public Works Department? (4) Having regard to the large expenditure of public money in the North Island of late years, do we in this island pay more than our share of taxation to meet the interest payments on that money? (of Can members of Parliament for the North Island, who have never seen the Soutli, be expected to he perfectly unbiased in discussing interisland questions ? It was noticeable. Mr Hinchey said, that the northern Press frequently attacked proposals for development works in the South with the object of influencing the Government, which was entirely to the detriment of this island. “ I feel sometimes,” he concluded, “ that this island is like a mandated territory with its Government on the other side of the water.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19350928.2.153

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 22146, 28 September 1935, Page 23

Word count
Tapeke kupu
413

SOUTH ISLAND PARLIAMENT Evening Star, Issue 22146, 28 September 1935, Page 23

SOUTH ISLAND PARLIAMENT Evening Star, Issue 22146, 28 September 1935, Page 23

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert