Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MOTORISTS “PERSECUTED”

TRAFFIC INSPECTORS ATTACKED DISCUSSION BY AUTOMOBILE MEMBERS “It is persecution, not prosecution,” declared Mr J. H. Hinton, in a strong complaint at the annual meeting last night of the Automobile Association (Otago) against the increasing number of charges of driving in a manner “ which might be dangerous to the public.” Mr Hinton referred to the “ invidious charge.” In his opinion, the solicitor who had remarked that an increasing number of reputable citizens were being brought before the court to defend the charge had spoken frankly. He had been prosecuted himself, and he considered that he had been convicted against the merits of the case. Very few motorists bad not ou occasions committed breaches of the speed limits, but it did not follow that they had been driving in a manner dangerous to the public. The phraseology of the present charge should be removed, itbeing inequitable and against the administration of justice. Once clothed in a uniform and dressed in a little brief authority traffic inspectors became impertinent to citizens. “ The time has come when we should put our foot down and demand that the man who might drive his car ,a little fast should not be treated as an ordinary criminal, and that he should be treated with the respect to which he is entitled. (Hear, hear.) 1 feel very keenly on that because I know of instances where the inspectors have not treated motorists with due respect. Representation should be made on the point to the proper authorities.” - Mr Hinton also complained of defendants in motoring cases being summoned to appear at 10 a.m. and having to wait hours before their cases were called.

Mr P. AV. Breen contended that any motorist who broke the speed limits should ,be prosecuted and fined. Mr A. H. Allen assured the meeting that impertinence by the traffic inspectors would not be countenanced by the City Council. The inspectors were expected to he respectful. They had a duty to carry out, and when breaches warranted prosecutions no person was excused.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19350925.2.27

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 22143, 25 September 1935, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
339

MOTORISTS “PERSECUTED” Evening Star, Issue 22143, 25 September 1935, Page 6

MOTORISTS “PERSECUTED” Evening Star, Issue 22143, 25 September 1935, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert