MAGISTRATE’S COURT

Evening Star, Issue 19802, 28 February 1928, Page 7

MAGISTRATE’S COURT

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27

(Before Mr J. R. Bartholomew, S.M.)

Judgment by default was given for pin in tubs in tho following cases;—!. H. Mac Lean, Ltd. v. Hallaux Isaac £3, .-ork carried out; I’- I 1 raser and oons v. Mrs F. A, Pope, £l4 10s 9d, groceries supplied; John D. Best v. J. H. Reeves (Mosgiel)j LLs UcL clothing supplied, IU chard Joseph Smith v. Thomas M'Ewau, £5, goods supplied; Otago Farmers’ Co-operative Association. Ltd. v. A. R. Lockhart. £l6 9s lid. balance of an account for cows and pigs; Paciiio Preserving Company, Ltd. v. Looming and »10. (Christchurch), £4 6s id. goods supplied; J. Lindsay ; nd Co. y. (V Cowic (Lindis Valley), £1 Ins, goods supplied; Peter Torrio v. Charles Nleper, £9, board and lodging; Watkins iind Ncilson, Ltd. v. Ernest Hope, £i 19s, balance owing for goods supplied; W- Gve tT<lr and Co., Ltd. v. I'. Mulhol- ’ d (Addington), £22 7s 2d, goods supplied; S. *L Andrew v. A\ . Styles, £l6 10s, work done and materials supplied. . On a judgment summons issued b.v tho Taieri Motor Garage for £3 2s 6d, R, Lockhart was ordered to pay forthwith, in default four days’ imprisonment. “ Ho generally disregards the judgments of the court,” it was stated of James Whelan, who was ordered to pay £4 11s lid forthwith to A. S. Higginfio.i, in default five days’ imprisonment. The motor bus claim and counterclaim case between Markham Motors, L !. (Mr W. L. Moore) and S. E. Clements (Mr J. S. Sinclair) was mentioned, and after hearing brief argument on a few points the Magistrate agreed to inspect a similar vehicle to the bus, the source of the dispute, at 11.30 a.m. on Wednesday.