RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
Friday, December 15. ;■■ '. i •■'< (Before J. Bathgate, Esq., R.M.) R. v. J. Snow.r-iDlaim Llsi amount due for wages. Mr Hay appeared •for plaintiff; Mr Stout for ;defendent.-i-After a good deal- of contradictory evidence had been given on both sides his Worship 'gave judgment for plaintiff for L 7, with costs; ' •• ' • '■ ■'•■ ■' i Adams, v. Thomas.—.Claim* li2. Bs,. fo jwages due. Plaintiff was non-suited. " ' ; ' Judgment was given for plaintiffs 1 in ths following cases :—Oliver and Ulph v. Robert Aylinfe; IS 12s, for 'goods supplied ; N.Z;L; andM.A. Gel v. Thomas Carrodus, Lls Is 9d ; James Finch /vr.r John- Connor, Ll4 2«j 5 James Finch v. Coskerryand Reids>L6o 18s (against Coskerry only); Kirkpatrick, and Co. V: William popplewelL Ll9 lis 5d ; W;. A. Smith v.' F._Crowder, I 6 10s ; He'elesj M'Beath, and Co. v.. James Smith,, IQ,Ab 3d; Stewart v. James Wallis, Le sa.| I
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18761215.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 4307, 15 December 1876, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
145RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4307, 15 December 1876, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in