SUPREME COURT.

Evening Star, Issue 4156, 23 June 1876, Page 2

SUPREME COURT.

(Before wLu aon andjAi W. Morm.^.^^ionO%.) M'KENZIB JTCD CO. ~ IV'!"' v - j£tll> THOMUfe -■■ Ja this 04ie, After we &£& to JjrmyesteMay, MrJlaggitt openWtte W^P I %* defence. Counsel said tHS* wii|i»ly one questiontolw determined, andj|j(fc > wai 4 she amount be awarded to the claimairtisr end widen Ml the value of the wJtottf-and a half years, subject to a rental of L3O a-year. He submitted that some of the witnesses fad

Siven most absurd and extraordinary «vience in regard to that question as put That evidence was utterly and entirely unreliable. Referring Ito mk evidence of Messrs U'Sdn, Proudfoot, and BttT, he ■ tbaj4t regard the oubical <)ontentM>f a quarry M '•' 'criterionof its value.•.."VV .. '._ i William::Borlase eaid-he M'K<&rieV quarry for abont a ,year pight months. Hit first obUined^JftijttK wards got a seven iold hisinterest m the le>se^^fK*Wjrtgr| fcrred 1 withHby-the railway, he would not tifctife Bam"B>«bh«r forthe quarry as he itA Cross-examined:. He did not owe M*Kentfeja grudgis, and was <m terinft/witb,;/ ;him. He new expired the bpMoa&hlt M'Kensie got thebest tiou. ' He believed that the. stone merease4 since heJ4p)d out p/ M'Kenfcie. -n-R- i «;. 't; Vv-'i ■■■■•■]- ■ Wv N. District Engineer, knew , SC'Kensie's quarry. There wasno Boattityjj. atTbrttJhatoeri t ol*stone whiqh it y About a', up the line another class bf stone equauy, ml,, ;good for all praetical--purposes would' opened up l>y The work has been practically put a stay . to hy Atso'olook-the<yourtadjourneo>_ r The case, ,*hrjM c o'deok tins V ; afternoon. . -> * < *« ■# The damages and L6O —