RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
Wednesday, June 7.
.(Before T. A, Hansford, Esq., R.M.) Judgment went for plaintiffs by default in the following cases ’.—James and Hardie v. Spiers, dlaim L 25, balance due .for work done; Hankey v. Long, L 8 ss, for |gas supplied.; Henderson y. Huff, L 8 ss, tor lithographic work. Stewart and Doughty v. Mayhew.—Claim L7O, amount due for commission. Mr A. Bathgate appeared for plaintiffs; defendant 1 did not appear.—Mr Stewart said he negotiated on behalf of defendant for a loan of L 7.000, which, however, fell through, but not by any fault of witness’s firm.—Judgment 'was given for plaintiffs for the amount claimed, with costs. O’Keefe v. Bryce.—Claim LlB 3s 4d, for road work done. Mr A. Bathgate appeared for plaintiff, Mr E. Cook for defendant.— After evidence had been given on both sides his Worship gave judgment for plaintiff for L2 16s. Bd, with costs. ’
Sharp y., Kirknesa.—Claim' Llolos, for trespass on plaintiff’s land at St. Andrew’s and damage done to potatoes: [Left sitting.]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760607.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 4143, 7 June 1876, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
170RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4143, 7 June 1876, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in