Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

Wednesday, April 26. (Before Mr Justice Williams.)

National Bank (appellant) v. Christie (respondent). - Appeal from the Dunedin District Court. Mr Smith for appellant; Mr Macassey and Mr Holmes for respondent. Judgment was reserved.

Capstick and Others y. Murphy and Others. —Motion to dismiss action for want of prosecution. Mr Macassey appeared for defendants, Mr Mouat for plaintiffs. The motion, as asked for, was granted, Cargill Others (Appellants) v. Merten (Respondent).— Appeal from Roxburgh Resident Magistrate's Court. Mr Haggitt appeared for appellants, Mr Macassey for respondents. [Left sitting.]

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18760426.2.7

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 4107, 26 April 1876, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
89

SUPREME COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4107, 26 April 1876, Page 2

SUPREME COURT. Evening Star, Issue 4107, 26 April 1876, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert