RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
Friday, D cember 17 (Before J. Bathgate, Esq., H. M,) Talbot v. W Greenwood.—Claim L 3 18 ■* 9d, f>i goods supplied; a judgment summons, Defendant denied owing the money, saying that plaintiff had sworn fa sely in the box on the hearing of the case.—His Worship said ho cnuld not re-open the Case. Defendant was a man who raid nobody, but skulked about and kept • ut of the way, so that summonses might not be served on him. He must pay plaintiff the amount within a month, or he would be talked to in a way he would not like. Be Reuben Hart. —An application for a renewal of a pawnbroker’s license, Granted. Jmlgment went for plaintiffs by default in the following cases;-Muir v. Lilbecroft,. claim 1.21 7s 6for goods supplied; Shotowr Terrace Gold mining Co. v. T. Summit. LI 5s for uu p >id calls; Herbert. Haynes, and Co. v. Haynes, L 16175, for goods supplied. Munro v. Chase. —< laim ; -20, damages sustained through defendant cutting away a quick hedge, the property of plaintiff. -Mr Chap man appeared for plaintiff ; Mr Stout for defendant, who pleaded not guilty, and nonjudsdiction of the Court. Left sitting,]
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18751217.2.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3998, 17 December 1875, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
199RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3998, 17 December 1875, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in