Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

We nesdav, October 20. (Before J. Bathgate, Esq., R,M.) H. Thomas (chemist) v, J. R, Crawford (surgeon). Claim, Llo 8s Od on a dishonored promissory note. Judgment for plaintiiT, with coats. Fitzsimmonds v. Craig and White—Claim, Lilt os, b-dance of account for wngig due. Judgment for LlO and costs. Reid and Gray v. Lindsay.—Claim, Lls. Judgment hy default, with costs. H. Bastings v. R. Hr,worth.—Claim, L2los, on a dishonored promissory note. Judgment by default, with costsGrange v. ( hj im. —This was a fraud summons to recover LHC,. Defendant was informed that, unless tho am amt was paid in a week, an order would be pronounced. The other caves were of a trivial nature.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18751020.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 3948, 20 October 1875, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
116

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3948, 20 October 1875, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3948, 20 October 1875, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert