LOGIC.
To the Editor. Bra,—lf your correspondent “One Who Knows really does know, he is scarcely honest: nesins against knowledge. I would ask him what right he has to tinker” the major premise in the Guardians “argument,” so as to make i 0 arrived at a legitimate one ? It sa 7 that “secular education is godless ; it is another thing to say that “ religion is an essential part of Education.” Of course the parallel” argument given was an absurd one ; it could not have been otherwise, for it was term for term and proposition for proBm the counterpart of the argument re to, and the conclusion, whether true or raise, had no connection with the premises.— lam, &c..
~° NB Who Wants to Know. Dunedin, May 12. .
fhS’?Cl!f“? y J apl)ear * 0 one Who Knows” that the article in question was written in supL?. Ur educa *£? eystem. To me it seems quite otherwise. When an article contains all the stock arguments against State education while no attempt is made to answer them,' f fail, probably owing to mental obliquity, to see open or a mMke<i
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18750511.2.14.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3810, 11 May 1875, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
184LOGIC. Evening Star, Issue 3810, 11 May 1875, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in