RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Evening Star, Issue 3775, 31 March 1875, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

W*Dir*BDAT, Mutex 81. (Before T. A. Mamford, Esq., R.M.)

•rmoxaits. . Judgment was given, by default for plaintiffs mi the following caises, with costs Martin and Watson v. Thomas Houston, L2 Is ; Same r. George Thomson, L 4 3s; same v. Alexander Mmr, 1A 2s Id, for firing supplied ; 'King v; Graham, claim liSB (less L 8 paid since the issue of the summons), balancopf aooouatdua ;■ J oho Meiklo.y,. I). F. Main, LA2a Bd, goods sold. Oargilla v. M’Bildft—This oas4, an action for damage (jg oement tmrtfdgh defendant’s oace-

lessnen. was heard last week.—His Worship now held that defendant coaid not be charged with neglect or delay, and gara judgment aoecsdiagly. Pearce v. Clark.—Claim LB3 18s 9d, balance due upon a contract for the erection of two cottages. In this case judgment also had been reserved after the hearing of evidence, and his Worship found for plaintiff for LlB 7s 9d-(being *v . t^an the amount sued for, the doers not being supplied according to contract). Defendant had admitted that had he seen the plaintiff before the issuing of the .summons he would have paid the amount claimed...