DISTRICT COURT.
Monday, February 8. (Before his Honor Judge Bathgate.) David Jenkins v. Robert Gawn.—Claim Ll2O, Joss sustained by the wrongful conversion, by defendant of two horses, the property of plaintiff, —Mr Stout appeared for plaintiff And Mr Maoassey for defendant.—The defence was that the horses were not the property of the plaintiff, haying been purchased by defendant fiom one Solomon Brown, whose property and in whose I ossessioa they were.-Plaintiff said that after he bought the horses in question Brown wished to buy them from him. offering LICO. As Brown had not the money at the time he obtamed the loan of the horses to work, but on the u , n ,^ ® an ding that they were witness’s property till he received tho purchase money. Brown afterwards “ cleared out,” and witness heard that before doing so he had sold the horses to defendant, —By Mr Macassey: Witness did not lend the horses to Brown for any stated time, and did not charge him for the use of them. - Judgment was given for the defendant with costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18750208.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3732, 8 February 1875, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
176DISTRICT COURT. Evening Star, Issue 3732, 8 February 1875, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in