WHICH WAS RIGHT?
To the Editor. Snf, —The heacjiog of this correspondence is incorrect, it should have been “Who was wrong?” “Your reporter,” upon his letter in this morning’s Star, stands self-convicted of incorrectness, and therefore he was wrong. If the report as amended be correct, the solicitor for the plaintiff either ignorantly or wilfully mislead the Court upon a point of law, and therefore he was wrong; and the Magistrate, in suffering himself to be so mislead, was wrong. |t should be a caution to him.—l am, £9., J. Pi Dunedin, June I^.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18730616.2.16.2
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 3220, 16 June 1873, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
94WHICH WAS RIGHT? Evening Star, Issue 3220, 16 June 1873, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in