RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Evening Star, Issue 3050, 27 November 1872, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

Tins Day. (Before A. C. Atrodo, Escp, R M.) Civil Casks. Simon v Dos.sott. --L3 Is iOd for work and labor dune. Mr Harris, lor the plaintiff, applied iur a certificate \.u ler theConlractois Lebts Act, 1871. Judgment by default for the plaintiff. iToudioet v. Hassell. jug Mr Stewart lor the plaintiff; Mr Handers for the deiendant, Mr Stewait applied that the evidence taken on the previous hearing should belaid before the Court, iu order to shorten proceedings, as the pHueipal object of the actum was to have a case to lay before the Supreme Comt. He requested his Worship’s attention to Thompson v. Lapwonh. 37, L.J , C. I’., 34. Mr .Sanders applied for an adjournment for a fortnight, which was agreed to. Hogan v. Evans.--L2 ‘2s, for board, lodging, an l refreshments. Judgment for plaintil?, LI J2s by default; l()s charged fur liquor not being allowed. Allan v. 1 illy. —1.13 13s 8d for interest and rent. The defendant aoiuitted the debt, with the exception of half the amount claimed for interest. Judgment for the plaintiff for the amount; ela mtd. Morlan v. H’lloa. —L7 7s, Mr Stout for tho plaintiff. This was a claim for the price of clothes supplied. The plaintiff stated that tho goods were made to order, and that before they were sent home the defendant tried on the coat. The defendant objected to pay, on the ground that tho clothes were not made according to order, and that lie had not received them. He called Jacob Dickey, who was present when the orders ■were given, and who slated that he had seen tho clothes, which were nut made according to tho orders given. His Worship said it appeared to him that one article at least (the vest) was not made to order, if a tailor made a suit of clothes, and brought them home, and they did not tit properly when first tried on, it was not necessary to take the suit. Judgment for defendant.