Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.

This DAy. (Before A. C. Strode, Esq., R.M.) Cmn Cases. Calder v. Nelson.—L2 4s 6d, the amount of a promissory note dishonored. Judgment by default for the plaintiff for the amount, with costs. Blackaddcr v. H, Fraser.—L9 17s 4d. Judgment by default for the plaintiff for the amount, with costs. Deuchrass v. Paterson and M‘Leod.— L. r >7 is 8d for 28 hags potatoes and hags Mr Stout for the plaintiff; Mr Barton fur the defendant. Captain James Deucbrass said ho sold somewhat over eight tons of Wanganui potatoes by sample, at Lfi 10s a ton. On applying for a cheque, it was at first promised, but a few days afterwards he received a letter declining to receive them, on the ground that the potatoes were worthless. For the defence, the defendant stated that the potatoes were arranged for by telegram, and were not equal to contract, and they were unfit for human food. Mr John Griffin said, after he had examined the potatoes, ho considered they were the worst he had seen in the town. Mr Robert Wilson, merchant, said they appeared to be from seed worn out, as if grown by Maoris. D. M ’Lend stated that, having had the potatoes tested by boiling, the firm decided to refuse to take them. His Worship considered the evidence was in favor of the plaiutiff, and that the sale and acceptance were complete. Judgment for the plaiutiff for the amount claimed, with costs.

Darling y. Bennett and Wc^dersjpoon. — LlB Is, Mr Stewai’t for the pjainfiiff; Mr Stout for the defendant, This was %n aptfop to recover a sum paid on account of defendants by the plaintiff, being a debt due but not included in a schedule of liabilities which the plaintiff had agreed by deed to pay, and which by the terms of the deed the defendants indemnified him against. Mr Stout asked for a nonsuit, on the ground that the deed did not confer the power to sue, and that the deed was at an end by subsequent agreement. Judgment for the plaintiff for the amount claimed, with costs, Harris v. Morgan.—L2 7s Gd, a claim for board and lodging. The debt was admitted Judgment by consent for the plaintiff, with costs.

Johnston v. Boxfield.—L4 10s for goods supplied. The sum of L 4 was admitted to be owing. Judgment for the plaintiff, L 4 os and ousts.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18720916.2.9

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Star, Issue 2988, 16 September 1872, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
402

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 2988, 16 September 1872, Page 2

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 2988, 16 September 1872, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert