RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
This Day. (Before A. C. Strode, Escp, R.M.) Civil Cases. M'Corkendale v. Douglass.—L2, a claim for forty loads of stone, at Is per load. The case was adjourned to Wednesday for further evidence. Wallis v. Smythe.—Ls 14s 2d, balance of account. Mr j. Smith for the defendant. The difference was one of measurement of stone supplied ; the plaintiff having charged 500 yards at ss, and reduced it to 405 yards. The defendant alleged that only 475 yards were supplied. Evidence was called to prove the measurement. It appeared from the evidence of the defendant that L 5 had been handed to Messrs Sievewright and Stout, in settlement of the account which plaintiff refused ; and on measurement being made it was found that he had been overpaid. Judgment for defendant. Gibson v. Allen.—L3 10s, for seven tons of damaged potatoes. The defendant pleaded only indebted for two tons. It appeared from the evidence that the defendant purchased seven tons, and that after fetching two tons he refused to take any more. Judgment for the plaintiff for L 3, with costs.
M‘Combe v. Proudfoot.—Ls 9s 6d, for work and labor done in clearing away scrub, &c., on the Port Chalmers Kailway. Mr Haggitt for the defendant. Receipts and certificates of settlement of account were put in by the defendant.—A witness in the employ of the contractors for the railway stated that be authorised plaintiff on his representations a certain time to clear away scrub.—The defendant was examined, and said he considered the items claimed were included in the contract and settled for at the final settlement. He knew nothing about the items claimed, until the summons was served.—His Worship, in giving judgsaid he did not consider there was the shadow of a claim as set up by the plaintiff. Judgment for the defendant. Godso v. Cornelius.—ln this case the defendant was required to show why he did not comply with a judgment of the Court, and pay the amount of a certain debt. He put in a discharge in bankruptcy, which include the claim of the plaintiff. The defendant was discharged.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18720422.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Issue 2862, 22 April 1872, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
352RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Issue 2862, 22 April 1872, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.