RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
This Day. (Before A. O. Strode, Esq., R.M.) Civil Cases. Harris v. Pritchard and Co.—L23, for professional services. The plaintiff asked permission to amend the plaint, as an error was made in the amount which should have been L2B 4s lOd. This was not allowed, and in eon equence of the absence of a material witness, the case was postponed to. i outlay. i Bi d v. Harrington. —CI 10s, for rent, less 3s. The oefeurtant sa d the only amount he owed was 5s 10d. He had received notice to leave from the plaintiff, and left on the day agreed upon, but leit a lodger in the bouse. He left toe wife of the plaintiff in the house, to whom he gave up possession. Judgment for the plaintiff, 7s with costs., Lilly v. Gardner.—Ll, for attendance upon the defendant’s wife during her confinement. Ten shillings was paid into Court. Judgment for plaintiff, 15s with costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18711122.2.8
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Volume IX, Issue 2735, 22 November 1871, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
159RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Volume IX, Issue 2735, 22 November 1871, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in