SUPREME COURT.
IN IUNCO,
Tins Day
(Before Mr Justice Chapman.)
Batiuiate (Trustee) v. The Bank or Otago. —His Honor decided that no amendment of the rule nisi as moved for could he allowed, the rule to he argued as it now stands; question of costs to stand over. Re s.s. Aliuon.— 'This was a motion to rescind an order of the 17th September last. Mr Macassey objected to the affidavit (it being sworn before Mr Stephens of Melbourne, who signed as a commissioner for taking affidavits in this Court) on the around that there existed no p over of appointing a commissioner for taking affidavits in this Court out of New Zealand. The objection was sustained.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18710209.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2491, 9 February 1871, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
116SUPREME COURT. Evening Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2491, 9 February 1871, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in