RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
This Day, (Before A. G. Strode, Esq., R.M.)Civil Casks. ILLEGAL DETENTION. • Sheldrake v. M ‘Dermid. —This was - an action to recover a saw and other articles, worth about L 25. Mr Stewart, for Mr Stamper, for the plaintiff; Mr Bathgate for the defence. After taking some evidence, the plaintiff was nonsuited. Griffon v. Blackwood. —L 22 Is Id, for goods supplied. Mr Haggitt for the plaintiff; Mr Stewart for the defendant. Lls Ss had been paid into Court. For the defence it was contended that the flour was had; that some of it had been returned ; and that an offer had been made to settle the account for nearly the sum paid into Court. After hearing the evidence, his Worship said it might scorn hard, but he considered that the defendant had brought the liability upon himself through not returning the flour at one?, but it was plain that by tho law he was liable to pay for the goods. Judgment for plaintiff, L 22 Is Id.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18710113.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2468, 13 January 1871, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
170RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2468, 13 January 1871, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in