RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
This Day. (Before J. Fulton, Esq,, R.M.) Civil Cases, Gillies v. Fitzsimmons— L 5. A claim for fencing a paddock. It was attempted to he shown that the L 5 claimed was included in the rent. Judgment for the plaintiff, L 5 and costs. •Cane v. D, Curie—Mr Catamore for the plaintiff. This was a claim for loss sustained through not giving notice by the defendant that he intended to resume possession of a vessel called tho Margaret and William, rented by the plaintiff, at 10s a week. The plaintifl stated that the defendant took possession of the vessel and moved her from where she was moored while the plaintiff was asleep, and tjiat he appropriated LI IGs worth of provisions. The plaintiff said he might, have marie two trips, by which he could have realised L 24, that he had a quantity of wood which would cost several pounds to remove. The defendant pleaded that there was no agreement, that he had received ,uo rent, and that there was no occasion to give notice, Damages for the plaintiff, L 3 and costs. Several, cases were called, but dismissed for non-appearance.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18700704.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2233, 4 July 1870, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
194RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2233, 4 July 1870, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in