RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
This Day. (Before A. C. Strode, Esq., R.M.) Civil Cases. Sontag v. Badger.—This was a claim for Ll3 4s, for fruit trees sold and delivered. There was no appearance of defendant, and judgment was given for plaintiff for amount claimed, with costs. Jones v. Ahern.—Claim of L 3, for goods supplied. No appearance of either party ._ Gregory v. Patterson.—This was a claim for L 4 14s 4d, goods sold and delivered. The debt was acknowledged. Judgment for plaintiff, with costs. Brien v. Mills.—This was a claim for L 6 0s 6d, for services rendered. The account was disputed, and defendant paid into Court L2 19s. Judgment for plaintiff, L 3 18s 6d—the coats to be divided. Bell v. Watson.—This was a fraud summons, calling upon defendant to show cause why he had not satisfied a judgment of the Court for L 4 Ga. The plaintiff was not desirous of pressing tho defendant if he showed any disposition to pay by instalments. An order was made to pay 5s per week, or in default fourteen days’ imprisonment.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18700204.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2106, 4 February 1870, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
179RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Volume VIII, Issue 2106, 4 February 1870, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in