RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT.
Tins Day, (Before A. C. Strode, Esq , R. M.) Elies v, \ awes.—This was a claim for L 4 for rent. It was a long and tedious case, lb appeared that plaintiff had had many money transactions involving cross accounts, extending over a considerable period. A number of witnesses were examined, and a considerable amount of elastic evidence given on both sides. Judgment for plaintiff, L 4 and costs. Ashmore v. Speers.—On the application of Air Stewart for defendant, on the ground of an important witness being absent, this case was adjourned until to-morrow, Jinksou v. Johnstone.—Claim for Ll4 18s 10d, money lent. This was a disputed claim, the defendant affirming that the chief item, Ll l, was for the purchase of a raining share in which both pdaintiff and defendant were equally interested. Judgment for plaintiff, Ll4 18s 10d. Miulie v. Duncan.—Claim for L9l. “ No appearance of either party. Case struck out. Hannigau v. Coyle.—This was a claim for L2 15s for goods bought and delivered. Judgment for plaintiff, L2 los.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18691223.2.14
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Volume VII, Issue 2070, 23 December 1869, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
174RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT. Evening Star, Volume VII, Issue 2070, 23 December 1869, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in