RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
This Day. (Before A. Chetham-Strode, Esq., R.M.) Civil Cases. Hay v. Robinson, was a claim of L 3 for goods supplied. The defence was that the books had been supplied on account of the Eire Brigade, and were ordered by the defendant, as a servant of the Corporation. This being admitted by the plaintiff, be was non-suited. Telfer v. Beale, was a claim for LI. The plaintiff sought to recover from the Manager of the Bank of New Zealand the value of a LI note, which had been presented to the Bank for payment but refused, althouhg the plaintiff had offered to give a guarantee if required. The note was devoid of a signature. Mr Macassey, who appeared for the Bank, submitted that the defendant was not liable as the note was not presented ip the state in which it was issued. The Magistrate took a similar view, and dismissed the ease, Spicer and Murray v. Alfray, was a claim for L 5 12s 6d Judgment was given for the amount claimed and costs.
Several other cases of an unimportant nature were disposed of.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD18690716.2.9
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Star, Volume VII, Issue 1933, 16 July 1869, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
187RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Star, Volume VII, Issue 1933, 16 July 1869, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in