Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PRIMARY PRODUCTION

COUNCILS TO BE WOUND UP

An indication that the Government intended to wind up the primary production councils.was given in the House of Representatives yesterday by the Minister of Agriculture (Mr. Roberts) in the debate on the Imprest Supply Bill (No. 3). When he referred to the assistance the Government had given to the councils an Opposition member asked why the Government was doing away with them. The Minister replied that he had received letters from farmers asking that that step be taken. , _. , v Mr W. J. Poison (National, Stratford): Has the gentleman had a letter from the national farmers organisation? Mr Roberts said he had had a letter from the national Farmers' Union, but farmers' organisations went under so many aliases that the position seemed rather sinister. At what time the councils would be wound up did not matter for the present. They had done valuable work and the Government had spent more than £30,000 in organising them. The dealings with the farmers had been one-sided. Although freezing workers and others had been declared essential, the farming industry had never had that declaration because the farmers wanted, to dispense with the services of workers when they wished. Mr S. W. Smith (National, Bay of Islands): The Minister knows that's not correct. • ■' Mr. Roberts: Certainly it's correct. They could have been declared an essential industry if there had been a sense of equality on both sides. If New Zealand wanted the farmers to be continually on the increase m production, the farmers should not have their efforts thwarted by slumps and low prices, and to that end the guaranteed price had been the very groundwork. ; The Opposition wanted to put into its election policy the abolition of the guaranteed price. Mr. A. S. Sutherland (National, Hauraki): The abolition of the Government. The first place in which to begin was New Zealand, as had been done, continued Mr. Roberts, and it had to be seen that the price level did not go to a height that might be undermined by other countries. It had not been forgotten that Britain was the best customer.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19451027.2.77

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Evening Post, Volume CXL, Issue 102, 27 October 1945, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
354

PRIMARY PRODUCTION Evening Post, Volume CXL, Issue 102, 27 October 1945, Page 8

PRIMARY PRODUCTION Evening Post, Volume CXL, Issue 102, 27 October 1945, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert