STOCK REMEDIES BILL
A correspondent (D. Spence-Sales, M.A.), protests against the proposals in the Stock Remedies Bill. The Bill, it is contended, wijl effectively muzzle the efforts of all private bacteriologists, however capable and up-to-date they may be. Scientists would ..refuse to have their work judged by the committee -which it is proposed to set up, and they would naturally resent the proposed inspection of private laboratories. The maker of a remedy will be required to disclose the ingredients used and the method o£ compounding adopted, and there is nothing to prevent the information thus disclosed being used by other interested parties. The correspondent maintains that the money required to carry out the provisions of the Bill could be better employed in numerous research channels. -
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19321122.2.35.6
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CXIV, Issue 124, 22 November 1932, Page 6
Word Count
125STOCK REMEDIES BILL Evening Post, Volume CXIV, Issue 124, 22 November 1932, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in