Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REVISING AWARDS

HARASSING CONDITIONS

AN EMPLOYER'S VIEW

Although a strong believer in the Arbitration Court as a means of deciding the rate of wages to be paid, Mr. V. E. Hamilton,' president of the Canterbury Employers' Association, holds the opinion that there are too many harassing conditions stipulated in the awards of the Court.

"During the year," said Mr. Hamilton at the annual meeting of the association on Tuesday, "our association and the federation in Wellington have takon an active part in the Arbitration Court's proceedings in Wellington which resulted in a reduction of 10 per cent, in wages. From my personal contact with many employers. 1 am confident that not one desired the standard of our workers to be reduced, and I know that an earnest desire' exists so to reduce the cost of living that existing standards may be maintained. If we are to survive as a nation, it was inevitable that .costs ;must, be reduced to enable us to compete in world markets.

"Kecently," he added, "a .demand for the abolition of the Arbitration Court has been; noticeable. . This^ I think, is regrettable, as it is necessary to have some tribunal to fix conditions, and no better machinery than ours has yet'been devised. It is obvious that without the' Court; every employer will be forced to come.down to the lowest standard set by any unsciupulous employer if he is to compete, and this is most undesirable. There is the fact, too, that as deflation proceeds and aa the cost of living goes down, the Court provides a constitutional method of adjustment between employer and employee, and surely it is desirable that such adjustment should take place in a constitutional and regular manner. The time, however, is ripe for a thorough revision of all .awards with a view to cancellation of the hundreds of harassing restrictions which are useless to the worker and; a source of annoyance and hindrance'to employers, such, for example, as the provision in one award that girls engaged for washing afternoon tea plates may- not wash kitchen plates without altering the whole internal arrangements ,of the kitchen and raising.the wages paid to the cooks." •-." '■.-••■. .;■■.''■'.;■"■' '■'

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19311002.2.120

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 81, 2 October 1931, Page 12

Word Count
360

REVISING AWARDS Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 81, 2 October 1931, Page 12

REVISING AWARDS Evening Post, Volume CXII, Issue 81, 2 October 1931, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert