CIVIL CASES

Evening Post, Volume CX, Issue 140, 11 December 1930, Page 5

CIVIL CASES

Judgment for plaintiff by default was given by Mr. T. B. M'Neil, S.M., in the Magistrate's Court on Tuesday in the following undefended civil cases: — Alexander Boss Engineering Co., Ltd., v. T. Wrigley, £5 14s Id; Singleton Sigus, Ltd., v. B. Twiss, £2 10s; J. A. Scott v. S. E. 0. Snow (separate estate), £24 16s 6d; Dimlop'Rubber Co. (N.Z.), Ltd., v. |C. J. Walsh, £9 Os 3d; T. Connolly v. A. Andrews. £1 Os 6d; Superior Pictures, Ltd., v. F. P. Davison, £S 7s Cd; Lawrence and Hanson Electrical Co., Ltd., v. Wright and Auton, £73 2s 7d; Thomas Forsytli v. J. Snowden, £3 17s Cd; Petrous Tile Co., Ltd., v. Thomas Page, £21 10s; L. T. H. Bramley v. B. J. Dalley, £3 9s 8d; Leyland Motors, Ltd., v. J. Puddick, £7 Ss Id; Plumbers, Ltd., v. C. Harford, £225 4s; Wellington Working Men's Club and Literary Institute v. David Paton, £10; Eileen Driscoll v. Harold Llewellyn Davis, £22 3s lid; "Truth" (N.Z.), Ltd.. v. W. Casey, £5 Is lOd; Wellington Federal Club (Inc.) v. G. Hathaway, £5 ss; Canada Tire and Eub|ber Co., Ltd., v. R. Spoug, £11 8s 3d; Canada Tire and Rubber Co., Ltd., v. H. W. Tapson, £2 ISs 7d; Famous Lasky Film Service (N.Z.), Ltd., v. F. A. Hunter, £53 2s 6d; Vacuum Oil Co. (Pty.), Ltd., v. G-. Newman, £11 6s 4d: Metters (N.Z.), Ltd., v. P. M. Hobson, Ltd., £61 13s; V. Recce v. Don Lauarch, £2 Ids; Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co., Ltd., v. B. T. Kose, £9 6s; G. A. Lang and Co., Ltd., v. F. Butler, £24 T2s 7d; George and Doughty, Ltd., v. W. D. M'Lachlan, £2 7s: George and George, Ltd., v. L. Morris, £9 3s; George and George, Ltd.,, v. J. Mitchell, £2 19s 6d: Superior Pictures, Ltd., v. J. Hunter, £4 19s 6d; Montgomery and Porter v. H. Wilson, £11 16s; A. S. Paterson and Co., Ltd., v. Waterson Bros., 13s; Bristol Piano Co., Ltd.,- v. Rebecca Silberry (separate estate), £1 Us 2d; Nash (N.Z.) Motors, Ltd., v. Percy Bowers, £4 3s 4d; 0. B. Ellis v. W. Williamson, £14 14s* Id; Kodak (Aust.) Pty., Ltd., v. I. Corn, £30; C. C. Wakefield and Co., Ltd. v. Denniston Motor Co., £3; Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (N.Z.), Ltd., v. T. Hughes, £10; A. E. latum v. M. Findlay (separate estate), £2 5s Sd; Superior Pictures, Ltd., v. C. M. Leaton (separate estate), £3 <s Gd; Timbers. Ltd., v. F. Butler, £67 Is Sd; E. I-I. Lund and Co. v. E W Wakefield, £6 16s 6d; Armstrong and Springhall. Ltd., v. G. C. Greening, £67 13s lOd; Toop and Neilson, Ltd. v P V.. Taylor, £S Is 3d; Atlantic Union Oil Co., Ltd., v. L. Connolly, £4 Os Sd; Len Southwood v.W. F. Beck, £3 14s sd; J. Jacobus v. H. Doherty, £3 15s; L. B. Lewis v. Stubbs and Co.. £10; J. S Vinscn v. George Terrill, £21 15s; Dominion Portrait Co. v. R. Price (separate estate), £2; Dominion Motors, Ltd., v. IH. Palmer, £4 17s; J. A. Jeanes v. Ell?n lidwards (separate estate), £1 16s Sd; iv. J. Purdie and Co., Ltd., v. W. E. Beale and Co., £4 13s 6d; New. Zealand Railway .tradesmen's Association v. T H Nicholas, £6; Wardell Bros, and Co. v. R lascoe (separate estate), £5 5s Hd; New Zealand Fruitgrowers' Federation, Ltd., v. H Parrelly £10 16s; New Zealand Institute of Architects (Inc.) v A Garnctt, £18 18s; New Zealand Institute of Architects (Inc.) y. J. O. Owen, £1S ISs; Aew Zealand Institute of Architects (Inc.) v- \®.:. Brooker, £18 ISs; A. M. Farnall v. William Glendinning, £M; A. H Symomls y Mrs. O'Neill (separate estate), ±14; W. H. Campbell, Ltd., v. John'Ctimmings, £5 4s 9d; City Corporation v. Horace L. Williamson, £5.

Tho largest collection firm in New Zealand is the Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., of Wellington, Auckland, and Christcburch, with agents in every New Zealand town, and associate offices throughout the world.—Advt.