Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RICH RICHER, POOR POORER

Since 1914, according to the Government Statistician's figures, the incomes over £250 a year had increased in the aggregate from £38,000,000 to £50,000,000—0r a rise of £20,000,000, said Mr. W. Nash (Labour candidate) at Day's Bay last night; and ho quoted figures to show that in the same period while the money wages of .the workers had increased, the purchasing-powor of the workers had actually decreased. Could there be, he ■ asked, anything more grossly unfair than such a position? The basic wage of the workers was about £4 a week, but there were 63 individuals with incomes of over £10,000 a year. But the Eeform Party, while in power, had all the time been cutting down the taxation on the

wealthy and keeping down the workers' wages, making "cuts" in the Public servants' salaries and so on.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19291210.2.102.10

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CVIII, Issue 140, 10 December 1929, Page 13

Word Count
141

RICH RICHER, POOR POORER Evening Post, Volume CVIII, Issue 140, 10 December 1929, Page 13

RICH RICHER, POOR POORER Evening Post, Volume CVIII, Issue 140, 10 December 1929, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert