HOCKEY.

Evening Post, Volume LXXXI, Issue 95, 24 April 1911, Page 10

HOCKEY.

FIXTURES EOR FIRST ROUND. The Wellington Hockey Association's fixtures for the first; round of the Cup matches are as follow: — SENIOR. April 29th.— United v. Wesley, Day's B?y No. lj Wellington v. Karon, ILarori No. 5; Victoria College v. V.M.C.A., Diiy's Bay No. 3. May 6th. — United v. Karori, Karori; Wellington v. Victoria College, Day's Bay No. 3; Wesley v. V.M.C.A., Day's Bs/y No. 1. _\lay 13th. — United v. Victoria College, Day's Bay No. 3; Wellington v. Y.iI.C.A., Day's Bay No. 1; Ivurori v. Wesley, Karori. Jlay 20th. — United v. Wellington, Day's B»y No. 1; Victoria College v. Wesley, Karori; Karori v. V.M.C.ii., Day's Bay No. 3. May 27th.— United v. V.M.C.A., Karori; Wellington v. Weslev, Day's Bay No. 3; Victoria College v. Victoria, Day's Bay No. 1. JUNIOR. April 29th.— Y.M.C.A. v. Hutt, Basin Reserve; Metropolitan v. St. Mark's, Karori No. 4; Government Insurance v. Karori, ' Day's Bay No. 2; \Vcsley v. United, Day"s Bay No. 4; Victoria College A v. Gregg'b, Duppa-screep ; Victoria College B v. Wellington, Mirarnar No. 3. May 6th. — V.M.C.A. v. St. Mark's, Karori No. 4; Metropolitan v. Kaiori, Day's Bay No. 2 ; Government liiouranco v. United, Day's Bay No. 4; Wesley v. Gregg'b, Duppa-street; Victoria College A v. Victoria College is, Miramar No. o; Wellington v. Hutt, Basin Reserve. May 13th.— Y.M.C.A. v. Karori, Day's Bay No. 2; Metropolitan v. United, Day's Bay No. 4; Government Insurance v. Gregg's, Basin Reserve; Wesley v. Victoria College B, Miramar No. 3; Victoria College A v. Wellington, Karori No. 4; Hutt v. St. Math's, Duppa-strest. May 20th.— Y.M.C.A. v. United, Day's Bay No. 4; Metropolitan -\. Gregg's, Duppa-street; Government Insurance \. Victoria College B, Miramar No. 3; Wosley v. Victoria College A, Day's Buy No. 2; Wellington v. St. Mark's, Karori No. 4; Hurt v. Karori, Basin Reserve. May 27th.— Y.M.C.A. v. Gregg's, Duppa-street; Meropolitan v. Victoria College B, Miramar No. 3; Government Insurance v. Victoria College A, Day's Bay No. 2; Wesley v. Wellington, Day's Bay No. 4; United v. Hutt, Basin Reserve; Karori v. St. Mark's, Karori. Juno /3rd.— V.M.C.A. v. Victoria Collego B, Miramar No. 3; Metropolitan v. Victoria Collego A, Day's Bay No. 2; Government Insurance a- Wesley, Karori No. 4; Gregg's v. Hutt, Basin Ke-erve; United v. St. Mark's, Day's Bay No. 4; Karori v. Wellington, Duppa-street. June 10th. — V.M.C.A. v. Victoria College A, Basin Reserve; Metropolitan v. Wesley, Karori No. 4; Government Insurance v. Wellington, Day's Bay No. 2; Hulfc v. Victoria College B, Duppa street; Gregg's v. St. Mark's, Miramar No. 3; United v. Karori, Day's Bay No. 4. June 17th.— Y.M.C.A. v. Wesley, Karori No. 4; Metropolitan v. Government Insurance, Day's Bay No. 2; Victoria College A v. Hutt, Duppa-street; Victoria College B v. St. Murk's. Day's Bay No. 4; Gi egg's v. Karori, Miramar No. 3; United v. Wellington, Basin Reserve. June 24th. — V.M.C.A. v. Government Insurance, Day's Bay No. 2; Metropolitan v. Wellington, Day's Bay No. 4; Wosley v. Hutt, Duppa-streeb : Victoria College A v. St. Mark's, Miramar No. 3 ; Victoria College B v. Karori, Basin Reserve; Gregg*-: v. United, Karori No. 4. July Ist.— Y.M.C.A. v. Metropolitan, Day's Bay No. 4; Government Insurance v. Hutt, Duppa-streal ; Wesley v. St. Mark's, Miramar No. 3; Victoria College A v. Karori, Basin Reserve; Victoria College B v. United, Karori No. 4; Gregg's v. Wellington, Day's Bay No. 2. July Bth.— Y.M.C.A. v. Wellington, Miramar No. 3; Metropolitan v. Hutt, Basin Reserve; Government Insurance v. St. Mark's, Duppa-street; Wesley v Karon, Karori No. 4 ; Victoria Collego A v. United, Day's Bay No. 2; Victoria Collego B v. Gregg's, Day's Bay No. 4. THIRD CLASS. April 29tli.— Metropolitan v. St. Mark't, Miramar No. 1 : Government Insurance v. Wellington, Day's Bay No. 5; We=ley v. Gregg's, Miramar No. 2; Victoria College v. Hutt, Hutt. May 6th. — Metropolitan v. Wellington, Day'e Bay No. 5; Government Insurance v. Gregg'^, Miramar No. 2; Wesley v. Victoria College, Miramar No. 1; St. Mark's v. Hutt, Hutt. May 13th. — Metropolitan v. Gregg's, Miramar No. 2; Government Insurance v. Victoria College, Miramar No. 1; Wesley v. Hutt, Hutt; Wellington v. St. Mark's, Day's Bay No. 5. May 20th. — Metropolitan v. Victori . College, Miramar No. 1; Government Insurance v. Weale3', Day's Bay No. 5; Gregg's v. St. Mark's, Miramar No. 2; Wellington v. Hutt, Hutt. May 27th.— Metropolitan v. Wesley, Day's Bay No. 5; Government Insurance v: Hutt, Hutt; Victoria College v. St. Mark's, Miramar No. 2; Gregg's v. Wel-ling-ton, Miramar No. 1. June 3rd. — Metropolitan v. Government Insurance, Miramar No. 2; Wesley v. St. Mark's, Miramar No. 1 ; Victoria College v. Wellington, Day's Bny "No. 5; Gregg's v. Hutt, Hutt. June 10th. — Metropolitan v. Iluit, Hutt; Government Insurance v. St. Mark's, Miramar No. 1 ; Wesley v. Wellington, Day's Bay No. 5; Victoria College v. Gregg's, Miramar No. 2. PRACTICE MATCHES. On Saturday afternoon, the majority of lhe players assembled at Day's Bay, where useful practice matches were indulged in. A little rain fell during the play, but did not cause the teams to desist. Some of the play was somewhat scrambling in character, but much 6peed was exhibited. The competition, matches j commence next Saturday.