RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.
This Dat. (Before C. D, R. Ward, Esq.,R.M.) Thomas Key and L. Futchen were charged with a breach of the Impounding Act, and fined Is each, with costs. Thomas Key v. Thomas Gaffney j claim £1 15s 7d for goods sold and delivered. Judgment by consent. Turnbull and Co. v. Bolls and Humphries ; claim £41 13s 4d, for goads delivered. Judgment for amount and costs. hichard Jenkins v. Thomas Price ; claim, £12 14s 6d, for work aud labour done, and cash lent — Defendant disputed the claim on the grounds that the work had not been done for him, but acknowledged a debt of 12s 6d, cash lent him by plaintiff. Judgment for 12s 6d. Gobby v. Beat ham ; claim £4 3s - Judgment for amounL and costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP18650928.2.10
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Evening Post, Issue 200, 28 September 1865, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
129RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Evening Post, Issue 200, 28 September 1865, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in