Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IMPORTANT MINING JUDGMENT.

—o An important judgment has been delivered in the District Court, Westport, bv Judge Weston. Anthony Turner, appellant, held a residence area at Waimangaroa, under the Goldfields Act. In September, 1877, he took out a certificate of registration, which, in September, 1878, he brought to the Warden’s office for renewal, but was refused, on the ground that the land had been withdrawn from the Goldfield—said to have been a mistake on the Warden’s part, the Government having merely reserved a block of land from occupation. The Koran! Coal Mining Company, who were the respondents, wished to carry their incline across the man’s area. They first tried to force their their way through with axes, and Turner resisted, and was summoned by the aggressors for assault. That case was dismissed, as involving a question of title. Then the Company summoned him to the Warden’s Court to have his certificate cancelled, on the ground that he had no miner’s right. The Warden who had misled Turner decided in their favour. Turner appealed. Mr Fisher and Mr Guinness for appellant, and Mr Haselden for respondents. Judge Weston upheld the appellant, and commented in strong terms upon the action of the Warden in cancelling his certificate on any grounds whatever, when he himself had misled Turner and placed him in the position that his certificate was rendered liable to forfeiture. He ruled that the facta proved did not warrant forfeiture, and gave judgment for appellant’s costs. L 36 10s. In face of this decision Mr MTvay, Administrator of the Goldfields, has entered another action to oust Turner. This course is generally regarded as one of persecution, since Turner, it is said, did not de«ire to hinder the process of the work, and would have accepted L3O, hut no offer was made Turner’s deposition, appeal, and costs, were defrayed by public subscription. Morning Herald.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DUNST18790425.2.12

Bibliographic details

Dunstan Times, Issue 888, 25 April 1879, Page 3

Word Count
312

IMPORTANT MINING JUDGMENT. Dunstan Times, Issue 888, 25 April 1879, Page 3

IMPORTANT MINING JUDGMENT. Dunstan Times, Issue 888, 25 April 1879, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert