RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT, CLYDE.
■—o— May 25, 1876. (Before W. L. Simpson, Esq., R.M.) Holt v. Duliig. Claim L 26, on account stated. After hearing evidence the magistrate said that it being oath against oath he was hound to give decision in favor of plaintiff, inasmuch as he had produced written documents, which must avail against oral evidence. Judgment for amount and costs. Charnock v. M ‘Donald. —Settled out of Court. Auckland v. Parsons.—New summons to issue. Hotop v. Parsons.—New summons to issue.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DUNST18760526.2.6
Bibliographic details
Dunstan Times, Issue 736, 26 May 1876, Page 2
Word Count
83RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT, CLYDE. Dunstan Times, Issue 736, 26 May 1876, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in