SUPREME COURT.
Invercargill, This day. In the Supreme Court yesterday a rule nisi was granted in the divorce case of Kcan v. Kcan and Aylward, with £100 damages against the co-respondent.—ln tho seduction case of Mildenhall v. Stevens, counsel for the defendant moved for judgment to be stayed, on the grounds that the verdict was against the weight of evidence and that the damages were excessive. Mr Justice AVilliams refused the application, remarking that the jury were quite entitled to judge of the evidence brought before them, and the damages he did not think excessive.—ln the divorce case of Sorenson v. Sorenson and AVatson a verdict was given for the husband, who was the petitioner, with £20 damages.—ln the case of the Now Zealand Agricultural Company v. Pagan and Dickson, the company recovered £615 interest on the purchaso of tho Ralussa station, which defendants had failed to complete.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DTN18840829.2.19.6
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 4089, 29 August 1884, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
148SUPREME COURT. Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 4089, 29 August 1884, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in