DISPUTED PROPERTY SALE.
Dunedin, This day. : The case of IMta Agues Campbell versus
William Kennedy, of New York, Basili Sienwright, jf Dunedin, Charles Head, and two other nominal defendants, will shortly be before tho Courts. The case is over the sale of tho Arcade property last year of Daniel Campbell, who has left the colony. Plaintiff alleges that she signed tho deed of sale under Sienwright's advice, not knowing he was acting for Kennedy; but she never received any part of the £12,000 alleged to be paid as purchase money; that tho deed was a fictitious mortgag-e executed by Sien-svriglit's advice f that she sold the land mentioned by Reed on Sienwright's advice in order to protect the same from her husband's creditors, and did so on the advice that it was not a bona fide sale, but that whenever required Kennedy would re-transfer tho land for a nominal consideration, but he had since refused to do so. Two commissions have been issued for taking evidence in America, whither Mr Denniston has gone in the plaintiff's interest.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DTN18840529.2.31
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 4010, 29 May 1884, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
177DISPUTED PROPERTY SALE. Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 4010, 29 May 1884, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in