Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NAVAL POLICY ATTACKED

Admiral Keyes’ Opinion SEA ASSAULT ON TRONDHEIM (Dy Telegraph.—Press Assn.—Copyright.) LONDON, May 7. Speaking in the House of Commons, Admiral of the P'leet Sir Roger Keyes (Conservative) said; “It is a shocking story of ineptitude which should never have happened. It is astounding that the Naval Staff would not realize that the attack on Namsos was doomed if German ships controlled Trondheim Fiord. I importuned Cabinet to let me take all the responsibility and organize and lead an attack. The Gallipoli tragedy has been followed step by step.

“Trondheim could have been captured easily if a few ships had entered Trondheim Fiord immediately _ the army was ready to eo-oi>erate. Naval officers have told me that there was no difficulty in entering the fiord, but that it was unnecessary, as the army was making progress, aud the Mediterranean situation made the risking of ships undesirable.” Sir Roger Keyes added: "If our sea power had been used vigorously aud courageously the Germans would have been in a most dangerous position aud would eventually have been defeated. ’Committees cannot wiu a war. Those responsible must be fully empowered to act without delays and conferences.”

Came In Uniform. (Received May 8, 7.5 p.m.) Sir Roger Keyes said that everything Mr. Chamberlain had said had strengthened his own contention that the capture of Trondheim was essential, imperative and vital. The naval hazards would have been trifling compared with those in other operations he himsolf had organized. Immediately the Norwegian campaign opened he had suggested to the Admiralty action on his own experience in amphibious warfare in the Dardanelles and on the Belgian coast.

Sir ’Roger Keyes explained that he came to the House in uniform because he wished to speak for the officers and men of the Navy, who were most unhappy. It was not their fault that the enemy was left in undisputed possession of the vulnerable ports and aerodromes. For nearly a month the enemy had been given time to pour in reinforcements and develop the air offensive which had had such a devastating effect on the morale of Whitehall. (Cheers.) “Ever since April 16 I had been urging the Admiralty to take more vigorous action in view of the Italian bluster,” he said. “I proposed naval cooperation by using old ships, the loss of which would not affect the Fleet’s strength.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19400509.2.81.2

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 191, 9 May 1940, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
392

NAVAL POLICY ATTACKED Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 191, 9 May 1940, Page 9

NAVAL POLICY ATTACKED Dominion, Volume 33, Issue 191, 9 May 1940, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert