Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT

CIVIL CASES Judgment for plaintiff by default was given by Mr. W. G. Riddell. S.M.. in the following undefended civil cases dealt with in the Magistrate’s Court yesteiday:— Ada Blackmore v. J. E. Bridger. £2B Is. 4d., costs £4 Ils. 6d.; Harold W. Brown, Trengrove and Co. v. Harold W. Brown. £39 195.. costs £4 Is. 6d. ; Mutual Life and Citizens’ Assurance Co. v. Arthur Cadman, £l3 3s. 3d., costs £2 145.; Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd. and Hill and Jackson, Ltd. v. F. Hall. £1 12s. 9d., costs 165.; W. H. Johnston v. Mrs. W. D. Blair (separate estate), £5 55., costs £1 10s. 6d.; Vacuum Oil Co. Pty., Ltd. v. Toohey’s Motors, Ltd., £lO3 14s. 7d.. costs £6 Is. 6d.; Esmos Timber and Machinery Co. v. Frank Wiseman. £l9 9s. 7d., costs £2 145.; New Zealand Collection Agency, assignees of A. S. Paterson and Co., Ltd. v. H. Martin, £4 16s. Bd.. costs £1 3s. 6d.; State Advances Superintendent v. Charles Alexander Roulston, £33 14s. 'od., costs £1 Us.; Robert Wales v. Horace Kinton Warner, £9 175., costs £1 ICs. 6d.; Art Cabinet Co., Ltd. v. Owen Edward Phillips, £l5 135., costs .£3 7b. 6d.; Art Cabinet Co., Ltd. v. Vincent Hayes, £2l 25., costs £4 5s 61; N.Z. Dairyman, Ltd. v. W. H. Ingram, £2 10s., costs £1 7s. 6d.; E. Reynolds and Co.. Ltd. v. H. W. Watson, £u 9s. Hd.. costs £1 13s. 6d.; Norman Arthur Foden v. Eric Francis O'Sullivan. £25, costs £4 Us.; A. V. Steward. Ltd. v. L, W. Ward. £7 ss. 6d„ costs £1 10s. 6d.; A. Robson v. W. Pritchard, 17s. 6d., costs Bs.; Aerograph Studios v. L. Allan, £2 3s. 4d.. costs £1 3s. 6d.; Aerograph Studios v. Norah Wardrop (separate estate), £7 15s. 10d.. costs At Us. 6d.; Aerograph Stuidos v. L. M. Webber (separate estate), 4s. 9d., costs 18s.; Aerograph Studios v. H. 0. Chapman (separate estate), 19s. 10d., costs 10s.; Aerograph Studios v. M. L. Thomson (separate estate). £9 Bs. 6d„ costs £1 Ils. 6d.: N.Z. Collection Agency, assignees of British Imperial Oil Co. (N.Z.). Ltd. v. C. Mathews, £1 14s. _lod., costs Bs.: N.Z. Dairyman, Ltd. v. S. Moodward. £2 10s., costs £1 135.; Prestons Service citation v. Robert T. Raymond, £l3 3s. 3d., costs £2 155.: C. and A. Odhn Timber and Hardware Co., X<td. y. L. C. Harris. £49 ss. 4d„ costs £4 3s. 6d.; Lmvereal Film Manufacturing Co. (Australasia) v. W. Henderson. £lO9 Is. 7d., costs £6 4s. 6d.; Charles Dickinson v. C. F. Thomas. £4 155.. costs Bs.; Goodrich failvertown Tires, Ltd. v. R. Harding and Co.. Ltd.. £ll7 9s. 9d., costs £2 10s.;. h. Reynolds and Co., Ltd. v. J. J. Heiee, ■£l&, costs £2 145.; H.-Turner v. J. Cavanagh. £22 18s. 4d., costs £4 4s. 6d.; An&UB and Robertson, Ltd. v. James J. Hayes, £3 10s., costs £1 lbs. 6d.; J» W. Cooksedge v. T. McLeod, £6 Ws- ci Sts £1 10s. 6d.; Thomas Henry Johnson v. Kenneth Reid, £1 65., costa Bs.; Kosma Jell v. A. Ellis, £l7 2s. Bd., costs £2 145.; Public Trustees, administrator of the estate of William McGill, v. Malcolm Sanderson, £7 10s., costs £1 10s. 6d.: James btewart Electrical Co., Ltd v. Nicholls Health Drinks. Ltd., .£45 9s. 6d., costs £4 le. 6d.; N.Z. Dairyman Co., Ltd. v. M. I. Thompson. £2 3s. 9d.. costs ,£1 3s. 6d.; N.Z. Dairyman Co.. Ltd. v. W. Hermansen, £- 10s., costs £1 13s. 6d. I'he largest collection firm in New Zealand is .lie Dominion Mercantile Agency, Ltd., of Wellington, Auckland, and Christchurch, with agents in every New Zealand town, and associate offices throughout the world.—Advt.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19280229.2.20

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 129, 29 February 1928, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
609

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 129, 29 February 1928, Page 5

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 129, 29 February 1928, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert