Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FAILURE TO AGREE

SECOND TRIAL OF A. G. WALLACE THIRD TRIAL FOR MONDAY The re-trial of Arthur George Wallace, who was adjudged a bankrupt on November 19, 1926, on charges of contracting debts without reasonable expectation of being able to pay them, took place in the Supreme Court yesterday. Mr. P. S. K. Macassey conducted the prosecution, Mr. M. Myers, with him Mr. A. J. Luke, appeared for accused, and the Chief Justice (Sir Charles Skerrctt) was on the bench. The charges involved three debts which Wallace had contracted between August and November, 1926, an amount of £5O to Wright, Stephenson and Co., Ashburton, £Bl 16s. 2d. to Pyne, Gould and Guinness, of Christchurch, and £122 9s. lid. to the New Zealand Fanners’ Co-operative Association, Ashburton. Mr. Macassey stated that the charges were brought under the Bankruptcy Act. When the accused man __had filed, his proved debts had been £7139, and his assets had realised £970, showing a deficiency of £6169. Wallace had known that he was insolvent in Julv, 1926. Evidence for the Crown was given bv Samuel Tansley, Official Assignee, and Frederick Howard Hayward, public accountant, who had made out the bal-ance-sheet, and who said that before August he had told Wallace that, without considerable cash capital, his position was irretrievable. For the defence, Mr. Myers said that Wallace, who was in business as a fruit auctioneer and broker, had. done a substantial business during his first, three years. His turnover had been in the vicinitv of £70,000 per annum.. He had sold large quantities of fruit from California, and had been hit by the embargo against Californian citrus fruits. This embargo was lifted in September, 1926, and the Californian trade would have been restored to Wallace. Also, he had the prospect of selling his business. Evidence was called along those lines. The jury retired at 4.2.5 p.m. and returned at 8.55 p.m., having failed to agree. A new trial was ordered for Monday at 10.30 a.m.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19280211.2.111

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 114, 11 February 1928, Page 12

Word count
Tapeke kupu
329

FAILURE TO AGREE Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 114, 11 February 1928, Page 12

FAILURE TO AGREE Dominion, Volume 21, Issue 114, 11 February 1928, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert