Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FOURTEEN-YEAR-OLD BRIDE

AGE FALSELY STATED MATTER NOT TO BE TREATED AS JOKE Dominion Special. Dunedin, December 3. William Joliu rarsuns appeared before Mr. Justice Sim iu the Supreme Court this morning for sentence on a charge of making a false declaration at Cromwell under the Marriage Act. On behalf of the prisoner, Mr. J. C. Parcell said that there seemed to be very little in the case. Accused had given the age of the girl he married as sixteen, whereas she was fourteen. The declaration, in fact, amounted to very little. His Honour: Do not continue on that line, Mr. Parcell, unless you wish me to inflict a more severe punishment than I intended. Please do not suggest that the matter should be treated as a joke. Mr. Parcell: The man has not done very much wrong. He is a first-class boy. His Honour: If you will be so silly as to continue on that line you will drive me to inflict more serious punishment than I intended.

Mr. Parcell said that prisoner had a good character iu the district The Crown Prosecutor (Mr. Adams) said it was difficult to understand why prisoner made the false declaration when he could have married the girl at her real age. His Honour: Could she contract marriage at fourteen? Mr. Adams replied that she could have been married at twelveHis Honour said that was so. A boy of fourteen and a girl of twelve could be married. . Mr. Adams ■ said that at fourteen the marriage was not void, it was only voidable. The girl had the necessary consent. His Honour'pointed out that the girl was under the age of consent provided in the Crimes Act. That, however, did not seem to have any bearing.

In imposing a fine of £5, His Honour remarked that in these cases it was not usual to grant probation, but to order a fine, or if the case were serious, to order imprisonment.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19261204.2.26

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 60, 4 December 1926, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
325

FOURTEEN-YEAR-OLD BRIDE Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 60, 4 December 1926, Page 7

FOURTEEN-YEAR-OLD BRIDE Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 60, 4 December 1926, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert