THE REV. HOWARD ELLIOTT’S CHARGES
Sir,—lt is great fun reading the arguments for and against this pother a Rev. Mr. Elliott has stirred up. Some, like "Fair Play” in this morning’s paper, to my mind evade the question at issue, blit "Angus Macpherson” in his 14 lines has put the matter in a nutshell. , Surely tho argument and also the rqv. gentleman, could easily be. settled if, since the inception of the Prisons Board, a list of prisoners convicted, nature of crime, date of imprisonment, and data of release (if anyl were published; then the public could judge impartially which side is right and whether there are at present prisoners still detained (conduct good) for lesser crimes. Whnt a saving of expense to the country this would have been if done in the first place.—l am, etc., BONNIE PLAY. Palmerston North. November 25. 1928.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19261129.2.107.3
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 55, 29 November 1926, Page 10
Word count
Tapeke kupu
144THE REV. HOWARD ELLIOTT’S CHARGES Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 55, 29 November 1926, Page 10
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in