Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INDIVIDUAL ECONOMY

Sir, —I was pleased to note that in a recent Issue you devoted a leading article to the subject of "Economy,” and to the lesson to be learnt by the rigorous curtailment b* expenditure nowfound necessary by the British Government. Anyone who has been in England in the last three years will have remarked on the extraordinary extravagance displayed by all classes of the community, and from this we may learn an even more important lesson, when we consider how much better able to withstand the present industrial crisis and high taxation Britain would have been if frugality instead of lavish expenditure had bVin predominant. The amount that can be saved by retrenchment in Uorernmaut Departments .is negligible, when compared with the sums that could be saved by economy practised by individuals; and whereas with the restriction of Government expenditure some undertaking for the public welfare generally suffers. The Imgo sums spent annually by the public on luxuries and frivolous amusements arc not. only not conducive to the public welfare, but even detrimental to it. . The fallaoial theories are still prevalent that a man is responsible only to himself for his expenditure, and that in spending a large portion of.his income on luxuries he is rather benefiting his fellows by causing employment, than harming them. But money spent on luxuries is maintaining the high cost of living, for money is urgently needed by tho essential industries; nnd cheaper money in them would be directly instrumental to reducing the cost of living. Nor would money spent on;luxuries provide more ''employment, than the same amount, invested in industries producing the necessaries of lite. , It is the duty of each one of us to hare according to his means. Surely the time is ripo for the Press and other inifuential organisations to initiate a rigorous economy campaign against individual extravagance, and to induce the Government to impose heavier taxation on the unnecessary luxuries on which snch a large proportion of the nation's income is squandered. 1 am. etc.. FOREWARNED.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19210622.2.6.6

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 229, 22 June 1921, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
338

INDIVIDUAL ECONOMY Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 229, 22 June 1921, Page 2

INDIVIDUAL ECONOMY Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 229, 22 June 1921, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert