THE WAIKATO MYSTERY
FURTHER EVIDENCE AT INQUEST. By Telegraph—Press Association. Hamilton, June 14. The inquest on C. R. Smallfield was resumed to-day. . . Dr. Pinfold, recalled, said that when he examined the body a pre-molar tooth was missing. He would say the body was that of Smallfield. He did not notice an appendicitis scar when he made the post-mortem examination. If the operation took place nine years ago he might have missed the scar. If a man. bad had his -appendix removed, it would not render him immune from 1 nteetwal trouble. In making mortem examination he did not towcl the previous point of incision, a rertica ol The Coroner said it was read the evidence,/ therefore he would Idkurn the till Monday and make an order regarding the body to-day to examine the toeth and appendix, if any.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19210615.2.22
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 223, 15 June 1921, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
138THE WAIKATO MYSTERY Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 223, 15 June 1921, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in