UNREST IN INDIA
FAILURE OF A NON-CO-OPERATION j MOVEMENT PRESTIGE OF NEW COUNCIL AFFECTED By Teltirraph—Prefl» A««oclation-Oasyrlrt» <( London, November 3. Tho Timesr" Bombay correspondent writes that, a general survey of Ghandi's non-co-operation ; movement shows that Uu campaign geuerally has failed. No Indians have renounced their responsible f°rei3Q goods are not boycotted, ant there is an 'abundance of candidates, including Moslems, offoring for tho new Council elections. Gliandi has alienated tho responsible elements of the communw oy his vehomence and violence. Nevertheless, the non-co-operation movement has grievously affected tho prestigo and authority of tho new Council. The country isr in.a estate of great tension, and trouble is anticipated. The Council elections aro fixed for tho middle of tho month. ■
' The correspondent adds that the only hope to re-establish confidence in Britiiali justice will bo a determination to Jead Th | roßre ?f ively 60 lf"o OYerIlm «'tf —
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19201105.2.30
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 35, 5 November 1920, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
145UNREST IN INDIA Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 35, 5 November 1920, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in