Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BLACK LIST

RECEPTION OF ALLIES' NOTE IN GERMANY

PROTESTS AGAINST GERMAN

TRIBUNAL

'By Telegraph-Press Association-Copyright (Rec. February 22, 5.5 p.m.) Berlin, February 18. The Allies' new black list Note had a mixed reception in Germany. Government circles are relieved, as it releases them from a difficult position. The newspapers comment variously. The Tanfiernian Press boastfully regards the Note as a climb-down. Some profess to see thn influence of Mr. Lloyd George and the rebuff of the French policy. Radical and.Socialist newspapers are calmer, and discuss ways and means of malting the German tribunal effective. The "Vnrwaerts" believes the tono of tho Note is an indication that concessions are possible in other directions, especially financial and economic—Aus.-N.Z. Cable Assn.

London, February 18. A. semi-official German view says the new black list shows the influence of rational considerations, but cannot bo regarded as a victory for European reconciliation, because Franco only yielded when she saw compliance was a physical impossibility. There is no indication that Franco is renouncing her other rdans. The nationalistic newspapers protest, against a German tribunal, which must not be taken seriously. The Government has resolved to proceed with n tribunal according to German law, as the Allies propose. The "Vorwaerts" doubts if iustiee will- be dona by Prussian Judges, who are saturated with the spirit of Prussian militarism—Aus.-N.Z. Cable Assn. PRECISE DEFINITION OF ACCUSATIONS DEMANDED. (Res. February 22, 5.5 p.m.) Berlin, February 19. Thft Government considered the Allies' Note with ref'rence to the war criminals, and decided to reply, demanding that tho accusations against several of those mentioned should bo precisely defined. The general accusations against nindenburg and Ludendorff cannot bo regarded as satisfactory.—Aus.-N.Z. Cablo Assn. war criminals¥allied hands GERMANY TQ REQUEST THEIR. SURRENDER. FOR TRIAL. (Rec. February 22, 11.5 p.m.) . Berlin, February 19. Newspapers state that the German Government intends to request the surrender of all war criminals now prisoners in Allied hands, to enable them to he tried by German tribunal.—Aus.-N.Z. Cable Assn. DISPOSAL~W~WILHELH INTERNMENT. IN EAST INDIES LIKELY. (Rec. February 22, 5.5 p.m.) London, February 19. Reports from Amsterdam indicate that while tho Dutch reply to the latest Note adheres to the refusal to surrender the ex-Kaiser, it is increasingly likely that Holland will agreo to intern Wilholm in the East Indies.—Aus.-N.Z. Cablo Assn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19200223.2.66

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 127, 23 February 1920, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
380

THE BLACK LIST Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 127, 23 February 1920, Page 7

THE BLACK LIST Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 127, 23 February 1920, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert