CLAIM FOR COMMISSION
fir TelograDh—Prose Ai»oci»ilon Auckland, November 25. Mr. J. W. Poynton, S.M., gave judgment in ft case in which Khan Bros, sued Clrarles Coward and Jamas Thomas Caseley, claiming JJbO commission, alleged to have been paid bv the second defendant to Coward. The latter was a i-oinineicial tuiveller employed to sell soft goods at .tit a week and travelling and laundry expenses. No commission was allowed on sMes. Before going on ins Inst round, Coward arranged with another firm to sell their goods on a commission of 5 per cent., without expenses.' Defendant on that Irip sold for plaintiff goods worth irom to JUOOO, and for other sellers ,£I3OO worth. Plaintiff now claimed the commission earned. The defence was that the commission was earned in Oho traveller's time, his working hours being fl to 5. The Magistrate entered judgment for plaintiff against Coward for .MO and costs, making a total of .£72 16s. lOd. Judgment, against tho second defendant was reserved for seven days. ,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19191126.2.45
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 53, 26 November 1919, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
166CLAIM FOR COMMISSION Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 53, 26 November 1919, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in