Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A DOCTOR'S DISMISSAL

I CLAIM FOR DAMAGES I CHARGES OP PROFESSIONAL ] -. ;■-,.... MISCONDUCT !' ■:', ..- By Telegraph—Presa Association. I ;r'.'.;...,,., .. . Auckland,.Mai 13. j -~-A civil*action, possessing some extra- ; ordinary features in,that the statement of defenco contains allegations against the professional conduct of .tho plaintiff i while he' held the position of medical J superintendent of tho public hospital at Mangonui, was commenced at the Siti preme'Court, before Mr. Justice Cooper !■' and a jury" of 12. The'plaintiff, Percy !'■ W. Menziea, of Clyde, medical nracti- ] tibner, sought (o recover from the Bay : of Islands Hospital amP Charitable Aid 1 Board the sum of J2Ol as general dams'' . agea, and £M as special damages, for ! alleged wrongful : dismissal: I The statement of claim showed that on ' ■ October i, 1913, the defendant board api pointed'the plaintiff as medical superin- ! tendent of the public hospital at MartfiOnui, at a salary of ,£l5O per annum, with I house allowance and certain allowances ! ' for maternity cases, and the right of i : private practice. The appointment waa i not for any definite town, and. there was ! no clause in the contract as ; to the notice ! ' required to termiuate the engagement. !■" On December i, 1917, the defendant board, without making any complaint and without 'giving him any opportunity ! of being previously heard in his own. i defence, notified. plaintiff that'his onj ga'gement would terminate at the expirai tion of three months. The said notifi- !' cation concluded with the paragraph; i "This action has not been taken because I • of any want of skill upon your part w I- medical superintendent of the hospital. ! Plaintiff alleged that ' the notification I emounted to wrongful dismissal, inasi much as tho notice given was not ''eaeonj . able notice in the ciroumstances of the j case. By reason of the dismissal the. plaintiff was forced to leave the district and to give up a growing private p* noj tice, and also to give up appointments f>9 [ 'medical 'superintendent to the Natives I ■ and as doctor to the Medical Club, whioh j were also held-by Mm while medical I superintendent of the Mangonui Hospital, ! • there being not sufficient remuneration !■ ■' in private practice alone in such a die- ' trict to support a medical practitioner. I- ' The defence was a denial of all the ; ' allegations in the statement of claim, ! ',• with the exception of those relating to I the appointment of plaintifi a? medical • superintendent, to the term of ihe ap- : pointment, and the manner of- tenninati , ing- the engagement. For a further de- ' fence it was contended that theulaintiff ■ inisoonducted .himeolf ■ in. the service of '■ ■ the defendant board by wilfully disobey- ! -ing orders'of the board, by charging fees ! for examination of persons desirous of j entering the hospital; by making exor- ! bitant charges and so tending to render ■ ' his assistance unavailable, in the district i exoept for wealthy patients, by unreai Bonably refusing admission of patients ■'" "'' to the hospital, by unreasonably refus- : ing to work with the district • nurse at ! Kaeo as- from .November. 22, 1917; by ' demanding and receiving personal puyI . 'ment from hospital patients; by beinjf ■ offensive in.his,manner,and using.opener™ and improper language to membere : of the board when being spnlcen to about '■ hospital matters; by insisting on treati ing hospital patients as private 'oatients, i and charging for operations and ct.ten- '■■' 'tion'to such patients; by making false I and misleading charges in l writing to the ; defendant board on November- 22, IPI7. ' against' Nurse Bedford, an employee of ! the board; by insisting on the uuarantcti j ' of fee 3 liefore attending cases of extreme ; . urgency, and 'by so conducting himself : in the above manner aa to arouse mib- < lie indication, \as h result of which vvb- : lie resolutions of protest from Whanjraj ma County Council, on November 28, '■ 1917, nnd from a general public meeting. ■ of residents of the Countr of Whantproa,' ;. held on December 1, 1917. were sent to : the hoard in regard to his aotions, end ! bo rendered his services aa ■' a medical mnn useless in the hospital district. [ Plaintiff was giving evidenoo when the i Court adjourned.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19190514.2.79

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 196, 14 May 1919, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
673

A DOCTOR'S DISMISSAL Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 196, 14 May 1919, Page 8

A DOCTOR'S DISMISSAL Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 196, 14 May 1919, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert