SUPREME COURT

Dominion, Volume 12, Issue 127, 22 February 1919, Page 2

SUPREME COURT

o CIVIL LIST FIXTURES.. W Sitting in Chambers yesterday, morning, His Honour .Mr. Iftistice Edwards niaae' the following fixtures in connection with the civil• cases lo be heard in (he Supremo Court:— ' Tuesday, Februwy 25.— H. S. Jrvino and another v. H.'.Spear, claim 12s. lid. tor work done... Wednesday, February 26.— W. M'Lennan v. W. J. Jorgen'son, claim .£BIO, balance .due under agreement. Thursday, February 27.— H. Heiimuin • v. Griffiths and Co., Ltd., application hi taking accounts. - Friday, February 28— J. Bradrjiaw v. ' J. E. Fitzgerald, claim <£750, breach of , agreement. Monday, March.3—K. Barber and others' v., R. Keenn and J. Keed, claim J3225, amount under mortgage. Tuesday, -March 4.-3. Staples and Co. v!' Hi •'Hanson, cl&im JS&>. money lent. ■ Wednesday, .March 5. —P. A. Hadley v. G.. W.rMinter and another, claim ,£2Bl , 14s. 6d., in respect of promirviry note. Thursday, March G.—L. P. Preston y. El H. Dillon, claim for specific performa nee and £100 damages, etc. t "Friday, March t—B. Hadley v. A. and A. T. Munn, claim for return of "stock," or .£160.' ■■ Monday, March 10.-L. W. M'Keime.r. ,;J, ;W. Cudby and others, alteration of agreement, or declaration. ' Tuesday, March 11.— E. E. Campion v. A. G. Jacobseil, claim .£250 damages for non-performance. Counter-claim return , of ,£25 deposit. tx DIVySUIT \, The hearing of the divorce case of Phillip Desire England v. Daphne Hetty England and another, and the counterpetition of the wife against her husband was concluded before Mr. Justice Ed.wards yesterday. " The verdict of the jury wns-'that the. respondent had misconducted herself, and on the counterpetition that the husband had misconducted himself a decree nisi was granted in the suit, and also in the counter-suit, to bo made absolute in three months. By consent no costs were allowed except as regards the sun) of J;4O lodged as security for the woman's costs. Mr. J. li. Heed, li.C., of Auckland, with him Mr. H. F. O'Leary, appeared for P. D. England, and Mr. P. W, Jackson appeared for the respondent and the corespondent.