Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COURT OF APPEAL

JUDGES DIFFER A COACH ACCIDENT In tho Court of Appoal yesterday, His Honour tlw Chief Justice (Sir Robert Stout) mado reforelico to tho case of Percy Brothe-is v. Fly and Young, an appoal lieard in October, 1916. In 1915, in the month of November, a niare urionging to Percy Bro'.hors, farmers, of Tβ Ore Ore, Wairareiw. ■was, as tlw result of a collision with a motor-Cj'f'O, killed on the To Ore Ore Road. Before tho removal of tho carcass of tho animal tlio mail coach from Mustorton to Castlcpoint, owned by Fly and Young, of Masterton, camo alone tho road, and tho coach-horses shed at tho body of tho dead animal. Tho result was that tho coach was capsized and smashed, tho harness broken and one of tho horses killed. Legal proceedings wero takon by Fly. and Yojug against Percy Brothers in the Mastorton Supremo Court, and a verdict for £154 damages was obtaiucd. Apainst this judgment, which was given by Mr. Justico Chapman, Percy llios. appealed. After argument upon the appeal had been heard, tho Chief Justico announced, on October 18, 1916, that tho 'opinion of tho Court was divided, and that tho Court thought it better that tho case should be argued ngain befbro a fuller Bench.

Yesterday the Chief Justico said that upon further consideration tho Court had decided tint tho amount involved was not largo cbouqli, and tho question raised not important enough to justify the expense of having tho case reargued. Tho Court proposed to deal with the caBO as it stood.

The Chiof Justico and Mr. Justice Cooper hold that the appeal should be dismissed; Mr. Justice Edwards, and Mr. Justico Sim, that it should bo allowed. The result was that Tinder section S8 of the Judicature Act the judgment of Mr. Justice Chapman in the Suprenie Court was affirmed. The main point upon which Their Honours disagreed was whether the dead animal, wlicn it was lying on the roadside at tho time of the accident to the coach, was in the "control and possession" of I'orcy Brothers. It so liappened ihat when the collision with tho .motor-cycle took place, the maro was in the charge of a man named Masted. ,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170510.2.75

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3080, 10 May 1917, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
370

COURT OF APPEAL Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3080, 10 May 1917, Page 9

COURT OF APPEAL Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3080, 10 May 1917, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert